The Ford Focus

Introduction

When Ford announced that the Escort name was being dropped in favour of “Focus,” I’m sure that some people announced that they would never own another small hatchback from Ford ever again.  A pity.  Although the late 1990s Ford Escort is much improved over the 1990 effort, it still lagged more modern competitors.

The Focus was launched in 1998 to much acclaim.

Engines

Ford originally offered four petrol engines for the Focus, with a direct injection diesel to follow.  Later on, a more advanced diesel followed, as will the RS Focus, using a turbocharged petrol engine.

The entry level Focus uses a 1·4 litre Zetec-SE engine producing 75 PS - this is essentially de-tuned version of the engine found in the Mark Four Fiesta.  It won’t win any races, but the 1·4 Focus is reasonably smooth, quiet, and economical.  The engine is a bit reluctant to rev much over 5,000 rpm, but given that it delivers good low down torque, this is not really a big problem.  Ford have used reasonably tall gearing (almost identical than that of the Mark One Mondeo TD) for the 1·4, which does rob it of some hill climbing ability.

The 1·6 is arguably the sweetest Focus of them all.  The 1·6 Zetec-SE is a gem of an engine, delivering just over 100 PS, but being very free-revving with it.  It’s also economical - real world economy figures are usually slightly better than the 1·4 - and on paper, looks around as quick as the 1·8.

The Zetec-E 1·8 version (essentially an engine borrowed from the Mondeo) offers around 115 PS, but the engine is a bit more vocal than the 1·6, isn’t as smooth, and a bit thirstier.  When I tried both the 1·6 and the 1·8 back to back, both felt just as eager, but the 1·6 was more refined.  However, other drivers have reported that the 1·8 does have greater mid-range poke (which you would expect).  To me, it felt a bit irrelevant.

Finally, the 2·0 Focus is the most powerful of the initial engines, with 135 PS, again the Zetec-E is borrowed from the Mondeo.  It pulls very well in all the gears, but the penalty is in poor fuel consumption and it can sound rather “gritty.”  As I write this, the new Focus ST170 has been released, but I have not yet had the opportunity to try one.

The original diesel offers 89 PS and the promise of 55 mpg.  It’s a little rougher than most of the competition, but performs well and is hushed at a cruise.

The newer diesel, badged TDCi, offers 113 PS from a similarly sized 1·8 litre engine, but comes with the benefit of common rail injection.  Drive the ordinary TDi back to back with the TDCi and you won’t want to give the newer version back!  It pulls very well all the way across the rev band, but like all good turbodiesels, has huge pull in the upper two gears.  The penalty is that it produces slightly more CO2 and is slightly thirstier (48 mpg, or so).  It’s also more expensive to buy - but probably worth the premium.

Ford are going to release a turbocharged 2·0 Focus in the near future, and if I’m lucky I’ll have the opportunity to try one.

Ride & Handling

Ford’s shows it’s brilliance in the chassis and suspension set up: the Focus has a superb balance between a smooth, comfortable ride and pin-sharp handling.  All models benefit from a smooth ride, approaching class best.  However, this ride is at no detriment to the handling.

Turn in is excellent, there isn’t all that much body roll, and massive levels of grip.  And that’s from the cooking model 1·4 and 1·6 versions!  If you overcook it, I’m told that you can get the tail to slip out, but bringing it back into line is very easy indeed.  I’ve chucked a few Focii about and probably not come close to the limit.  The most entertaining was probably the 2·0 Zetec ESP model, which comes with an “anti-idiot” lamp (and system), on account of the greater power, reassurance of the system, and improved grip compared to the lesser models.  Knowing someone with an ESP model, the system only kicks in when it is wet or icy.

Overall, it is fair to say that Ford has played the Peugeot game, and beats it (indeed, modern Peugeots now err on the side of ride rather than handling).  It is just as good, if not better, than the Peugeot 306 in the hands of an enthusiastic motorist, but it won’t bite your hands off if you feed it too much.

Interior

At first, the dashboard of the Focus seems a bit gimmicky.  It has vents dotted about the place and some buttons look carefully disguised.  But as a car to live with, and cover a lot of miles in, it’s very user-friendly.  The air conditioning buttons look especially neat, and the “one shot down” operation of the drivers electric window a neat solution.  I am also impressed with the build quality of the car - doors shut with a thunk, and panel gaps are small and consistent across the entire car.

It is also very big inside.  There is masses of room in both the front and the rear, and a large boot.  It has a broad cabin too - there is more room in the inside of a Focus hatchback than there is in the first generation Mondeo.  This makes a very compelling argument for downsizing from a Mark One or Mark Two Mondeo to the Focus.

Exterior

Not unlike the Ka, some people like the Focus, some people dislike it.  It features Ford’s “Edge” styling, and has some Ka-like details such as the front headlights.  It does take a bit of getting used to, but there are a lot about, and the shape is considered “normal” now.  And for those people that have taken a dislike to the Focus, well if you can bring yourself to try one, do so.  Otherwise, tell everybody, which may force used prices down, so they’ll be cheaper for the rest of us.

Verdict

I like the Focus.  Ten years ago, the thought that a humble 1·6 front wheel drive Ford could be so much fun would have people chuckling at you.  Add in the huge interior, real world fuel economy of over 40 mpg, and excellent motorway refinement, and you have a winner.

No, I love it!