The Vauxhall Cavalier

 

Introduction

 

The mark three Vauxhall Cavalier was a good seller, and it’s easy to see why.  Vauxhall rushed the replacement Vectra through because of the brilliance of Ford’s Mondeo – but the Cavalier was a fine car.  Outclassed, depending on your priorities and needs, but a fine one nevertheless.

 

Engines

 

The Cavalier used a large number of engines during its lifespan, ranging from a 1·4 litre petrol through to a 2·5 litre V6, and encompassing two diesel options along the way.

The smallest petrol engine is the 1·4, derived from the same one that powered the Nova and Astra.  Although not favoured by the trade, or even the public, the 1·4 Cavalier is not as slow as the 15 seconds to 60 dictate - at least, not compared to the 1·6 version.  Indeed, the carburettor 1·4 has 75 PS and the carburettor 1·6 has 82 PS.  On paper it was also economical (a Combined Euromix figure of just under 41 mpg) but on the road, the 1∙6 models is a better bet.

Vauxhall produced three 1·6 Cavaliers.  The early 1·6 Cavalier was more or less the standard base model and in terms of output, the carburettor 1·6 has only a slight power advantage over the 1·4, but does have another 22 Nm of torque.  The carburettor 1·6 is also economical, with a Euromix figure of just under 42 mpg.  On the road the 1∙6 is “acceptable” to drive.

Later in the Cavalier’s life, Vauxhall introduced a revised, fuel injected and catalyst-equipped 1·6, which had just 70 PS.  Fuel economy also dropped, but to a respectable 40 mpg.  Finally, as part of their “green drive,” Vauxhall introduced a 1·6 E-Drive Cavalier – using a revised engine and taller gearing, this Cavalier managed a Combined Euromix figure of over 43 mpg.  However, to drive, the E-Drive feels utterly gutless – more associated with the tall gearing than anything else.  But if you wanted an efficient motorway cruiser, you could do a lot worse.

The 1·8 litre Cavalier was an altogether much pokier prospect than the 1·6, but the fuel injected versions lost some of the carburettor versions’ low down thump (we can blame early catalyst systems for this).  Both versions muster 90 PS and 145 Nm of torque.  The 1·8 Cavalier is still reasonably economical, with the carburettor version managing almost 38 mpg and the fuel injected model 37 mpg.

Vauxhall used several 2.0 engines, all with fuel injection.  Early “cooking model” 2·0 engines had eight valves and produce 115 PS of power and around 170 Nm of torque, could hit 60 in around 9 seconds, but still managed an impressive 36 mpg (mainly due to the engine “leaning out” at a cruise, and tall gearing).  The sportier SRi Cavaliers also has eight valves, but the engines produced 130 PS and 180 Nm.  With lower gearing, acceleration was much improved, despite the car taking 9·5 seconds to 60 (requiring third gear).  Fuel economy remains impressive, at 35 mpg.  Of the 2∙0 models I’d go for the SRi.

The Cavalier GSi used a sixteen valve version of the 2·0 litre engine, producing 150 PS and 196 Nm of torque, provides the Cavalier with sparkling acceleration - it hits 60 in a quoted 7·5 seconds, and returns 33 mpg.

The Cavalier Turbo used a turbocharged 2·0 litre engine, with 204 PS, 278 Nm, and reaches 60 mph in a quoted 6·4 seconds.  I don’t know too much about the Turbo.

The largest petrol engine is fitted to the Cavalier V6, of 2·5 litres in capacity.  Thanks to twenty four valves, you get 170 PS and 225 Nm, was the performance flagship in the car’s later years.  On paper, it’s quick - reaching 60 mph in 7·3 seconds and on to 145 mph, as well as having reasonable fuel economy of 31 mpg.  The Cavalier V6 has an altogether different feel to the 2·0 models, being tall in the gearing and a rather lazy approach.  It’s very smooth, quiet and refined for a Cavalier.

The Cavalier also had two diesel options - the “atmo” 1·7 and the turbocharged 1·7 version.  The “atmo” 1·7 is, to be blunt, gutless.  It’s noisy and slow, but at least it is economical, and reasonably refined.

The turbocharged 1·7 is an altogether much better prospect.  It might not be as powerful as its main rivals, but performance and economy is competitive, and it is reasonably refined too.  The donk, actually an Isuzu engine, has good power delivery characteristics for the generation - an absence of turbocharger lag is the main benefit.

 

Handling & Ride

 

If the Cavalier gets a gold star for its wide engine range, it must lose points for not really having the handling to match.  At least, it would if you read every road test report.  Well, I have to report that the Cavalier’s reputation for stodgy handling is reasonably accurate.  The more powerful versions will all too easily spin their inside wheel when tackling a sharp bend then proceed to understeer whereas the smaller engined versions feel a bit lurchy when changing direction.

The payback is, in some respects, in the ride.  The car has a smooth motorway ride, but it can get a bit floaty over rough surfaces at higher speed.

The sportier models have, in isolation, much better handling (at the expense of a harder ride).  The best compromise that I have driven is probably the earlier SRi models, which have a firmer ride than the ordinary 1·4, 1·6, 1·8 and 2·0 models, but have improved handling.

 

Interior

 

I’m not really a fan of the Cavalier’s interior - it has never really seemed all that friendly to me.  However, it works well enough, it’s easy to use, everything falls to hand reasonably well, and it’s well put together.

As far as room goes, it’s easy to get a good driving position, and there is plenty of room in the front.  In the back, the car is adequate if not huge.  However, the boot is big, and the Cavalier is a very versatile hatchback when required.

Most Cavaliers are well specified, especially the models from 1994 which had ABS as standard.

 

Exterior

 

The Cavalier is a little bit bland and a little bit faceless - I personally don’t have a problem with this.

 

Verdict

 

The mark three Cavalier is not as complete a car as more modern competitors - but it is an economical motorway cruiser, with tough engines and cheap parts.  I do like the car, even if out-driven by the Mondeo.