Blogging Archive

27 October 2004 – Ka Troubles

It’s been a troubling few weeks with regard to the Ka.

First off, his ABS is currently not functioning.  The problem is a duff front drivers side speed sensor, but the part in question is a factory order one.  And the factory didn’t have any, so there was a delay of a week before the part could be acquired and Kermit could be fixed.  All up, it’ll be four weeks between the ABS lamp illuminating and the sensor being fixed, but for two of those we were out of the country.

On to his tyres, and Kermit’s been running on Wynstar tyres at the front and Falken at the back.  In the dry, there’s some difference between the two tyres.  The Wynstars squeal and let go, but it’s reassuringly progressive.  Lifting off the power results in the nose tucking in but I’ve yet to unstick the back.

In the wet, however, it’s a different story.  It’s been raining a lot!  The Wynstars just don’t work on Kermit, no matter at what pressure I run them at.  From rest, I have wheelspin if I’m at all keen.  Actually, if I boot it from rest, it’s still wheelspinning in to the low 50s in third gear.  This is a reflection on how dismal the tyres are.  You know you have issues with the tyres when the effect of the air conditioning compressor kicking off is enough to entice wheelspin!

A car that has poor low speed acceleration is a pain, but a car with poor deceleration is a menace.  In the absence of ABS, I’ve had to relearn the necessary sensitivity required for cadence braking.  It all comes back to you very quickly, but his front wheels lock up very easily in the wet.  They’ll show signs of locking up under just moderate braking from speed.

To this end, we’re binning the Wynstars for some more Falkens!  But before I did, I followed the advice of a friend of mine, who helpfully suggested I swap the front and rear tyres around, “just to experience a loose assed Ka.”  After a spin, I did get into the knack of darting into a corner, lifting off the power just enough to coax the back into a oversteery slide, then back on the power to pull it through.  However, although the chassis is wonderfully stable, a change of road surface can cause all sorts of excitement!

Further problems; Kermit dropped a headlight bulb, so I’m riding about in a “one eyed monster,” as the safety videos broadcast a few years back.  It’s obvious from inside the car that you’re one lamp down, although the Ka’s lights perform better than I was expecting - and much better than my Cinquecento.  At distance, there’s noticeably less illumination.  Close in, it’s the passenger side bulb that has gone so there’s little in the way of kerb illumination inside four or five feet.  Mid-range, there’s not much in it (the Cinq’s lights were not exactly wonderful at the best of times, and with one headlight it was easier to drive by memory).  Anyway, as a result of him blowing a bulb we’re accelerated our plans to get the Morettes put on to the lad.

19/10/2004 – EnthusiastiKa Nonsense

Click here to appreciate this blog.

It’s amazing how underhand somebody can get when they feel wronged.

Depending on when you’re reading this, the definition of EnthusiastiKa was put up on http://www.urbandictionary.com/ by somebody who, clearly, feels wronged by the magazine.  I suspect that the intention is to get me to respond.  So I attempted to discuss the situation in the Ka Klub forum.  Guess what?  After some heads-in-the-sand posting, like “don’t take things so seriously,” that night the relevant posts were deleted.

Can anybody else smell a cover up?

The individual concerned isn’t bothered about hiding their identification (don’t you just love IP addresses?), so I know who you are and what ISP you’re using.

The trouble is that these sorts of cheap shots just make Charlie all the more determined to continue publication of the magazine.  There are over a hundred names on the email list, and the list was started just two months ago as I write this.

And that’s what they are - cheap shots.  Criticising the magazine for having “no content” is rich when the other rumoured Ka magazine has absolutely no content whatsoever.  How come?  Because it’s not been produced, there is no other Ka magazine (as I write this).

But you know, what really upsets me is how the UK Ka Klub believe they have the right to exclusive Ka content.  There is no official Ka magazine (just ask Ford), no official Ka Klub magazine (one has been coming for a number of months now), indeed the Ka Klub certainly isn’t official in any way.  Ford have not offered them the rights to the Ka and they certainly don’t have rights to a Ka owners club, either.  So what gives?

I don’t care for digs at my beliefs (I’m writing about religious persuasion here) because they’re founded on ignorance or stupidity.  I don’t want some kind of competition with the Ka Klub, I don’t want members feeling that they must decide what to support - quite the opposite, I want the Klub to succeed and I see it as being just one avenue.  I’m not interested in some kind of war of words, since perpetuating will only lead to a rift.  So what do I do?

If you know the answer to this, I’d love to hear from you - contact me if you will!

04/10/2004 – Unlucky For Some

We had an unlucky week in late September.  First off, the Ka Klub chairman wrote that EnthusiastiKa was formed “because the wife of the creator couldn’t put together a half decent Klub magazine” and that there was “no content,” amongst other things.  Unfortunately, in additional to being incorrect on several points, he has also burnt his bridges.  I’ve resigned from my position of North East Regional Representative of the Ka Klub and I will not support them in the way I have done whilst the Klub is being “run” by a hypocritical dictator.

Meanwhile, we’ve been trying to buy a house but the bank have delayed and delayed the offer documentation.  It was finally produced on the Thursday before we were due to fly out to the United States of America, but it was incorrect.  They did re-issue it during our holiday but other issues have delayed the purchase.

Then, when leaving the office to start my holiday on Friday lunch, Kermit’s ABS remained lit.  I’ll have to get this seen to shortly.

Finally, after spending just eleven days away from him, when we returned to the United Kingdom his battery was flat.  This may be associated with the fact that I left his OBD-II Scanner plugged in, but it’s especially annoying to be fair.  More so because it is my fault!

The day after we had the battery replaced, I came down with tonsillitis!

So, yes, it’s been a bit unfortunate!

12/06/2004 – York’s Traffic Problem

York council have a difficult job, I’ll admit.  On the one hand, York is a “nice” city, with a thriving tourism business successfully combined with some proper shops in the city centre and on the outer ring road.

It’s a good place to live and work, setting aside the high price of property.

But it has a problem with traffic.  On the one hand, people feel that they need to use their private cars to get to where they are going.  To a degree, I sympathise – there’s a balancing act between making York accessible to those people who need to travel about the city, and for those people who are visiting.  However, on the other hand, York’s traffic system is deliberately designed to favour busses, cyclists, pedestrians, taxis and indeed any vehicle other than the heavy goods vehicle and car.  And this sucks, but I’ll detail my rationale for this later.

A significant chunk of the city centre is (supposedly) closed off to non-bus, non-taxi traffic during the working day (that is, eight in the morning until six in the evening).  This means that cars should use the inner ring road, the outer ring road, indeed anywhere except using the city centre.

There is some policing of the above city centre closure, but not much.  There are short cuts that one can take – I’ve made it my business to find most of them – and this means that one can travel about the city rather freely, without worrying about using the heavily congested inner ring road.

Congestion?  I’ve observed the flow of traffic around the city and the conclusion that I’ve reached is that the traffic light timing at critical junctions are designed to slow traffic flow.  I’m supposing that the rationale behind this is to encourage people to use the busses, walk, cycle, indeed do anything other than sit in their car in a traffic jam.

Worse still, although the volume of traffic varies from day to day (associated with the weather, events taking place, so on and so forth) in the absence of a race meeting, it doesn’t vary that much.  So why does the traffic problem move about the city so much?

As an example, I left Office World at 16:22 on Foss Islands Road, and arrived at the Askham Bar Tesco at 16:59 hours.  I covered four miles in thirty seven minutes.  I spent almost thirty minutes queuing along Nunnery Lane.  Tadcaster Road was moderately busy, but not excessively so – the problem seemed to be that the traffic lights at the top of the Nunnery Lane / Station Road / Tadcaster Road junction were deliberately set to only allow three or perhaps four vehicles through at once.

But I’ve since driven this route at the same time, and the lights have let over a dozen vehicles through.  Instead, traffic lights on the other side of the city have been on this funky timer setting.

I’ve had no response from the council regarding this.  Not yet.  I’ll keep asking.

Are the traffic light timings deliberately set up to cause traffic problems?

15/04/2004 – Parcel Delivery

You have to admire parcel delivery van drivers.  They presumably have to learn a number of important catch phrases, such as “delivery, mate” (to any traffic wardens), “come on darling you could get a bus down there” (to any female Corsa drivers unwilling to move between two parked vehicles), and “bacon bap with extra grease, please” in the local greasy spoon.  Oh and, “could you take this for number three?”

Of course, if there’s nobody next door, they drop a little card through your letter box, and you have to ring their number to arrange a new time to deliver.

This has happened to us.  Our boot drive is failing so we need a replacement, and I’ve ordered a nice fat 80 Gb unit (it’s a fat drive for us).  Since Charlie and I work during the day, when the chap came around we weren’t around.  I arrive home about half five, and ring their number to arrange that I’ll collect it the next day.

No answer.  Well the card says they’re open until six o’clock, so I keep trying, and they keep ignoring it.  I give up just after six, and try again the following morning from eight o’clock.

Now then here’s a surprise - their telephone number is engaged.  So I try and try again, but there’s no getting through until close to nine o’clock, “oh, it’s gone out again today, but you can collect it tomorrow, or maybe Monday?”

Grrr!  Meanwhile, our new hard drive will have been tossed about in the van for two days in a row.

13/04/2004 – I’m Sorry!

I admit, I’ve upset people - and I’m sorry.  I didn’t mean to do it; I guess people take things too seriously?

When leaving the office this lunch - turning right onto a very busy line of traffic - I “dared” pull into a space in stop / go traffic in front of a reasonably young and quite attractive lady with two toddlers in the back of her Fiat Multipla JTD and two babies next to her.  Dared?  Well yes, because when repeated blasts of the Fiat horn failed to attract my attention, she pulled alongside (quite an achievement in itself), powered her window down, and attempted to give me a piece of her aggravation.  I believe her precise expression was, “how f*****g dare you f*****g pull out in f*****g front of me when you f*****g don’t have f*****g right of f*****g way you f*****g w****r c**t.”

I believe I understand why her language degenerated as her monologue continues, because I was looking right at her, tongue extended, wagging my head from side to side in mockery.  Then the dulcet tones of Kylie Minogue’s “Fever” (well hardly dulcet, more like raunchy) were put on the lad’s CD player and I couldn’t hear much else besides Ms. Minogue.  That may have annoyed her too, but I didn’t hear anything else from the young lady, and by this point had dismissed the Multipla as an irrelevance to my journey.  A suitable wave (not the finger, heh) and I was on my way.

Admittedly, I could have waited for a suitable gap to appear.  But wait.  There was plenty of room in front of the Multipla and nobody else was moving, so I seized an opportunity.  I certainly didn’t force myself into the flow of traffic nor do I believe I caused an inconvenience to anybody, other than the imaginary one that presumably made her react in the way that she did.

My theory is that she is a nanny forced into driving the Multipla by her employers, but her own car is probably a black Golf GTI.  If this is the case, then I would like to offer my most sincere apologies to her employers, because their kiddies may well have learnt some colourful new words.

13/03/2004: Office Security

Office security is something that we all need to take very seriously.  We also need a register of who is in the building should there be a fire or security alert, and everybody has to leave the building.  These are perfectly respectable and sensible precautions.

I mean, we don’t want riff-raff in the office, now, do we?

But sometimes, pettiness can overtake the prudent use of the signing in book.  Micromanagement of quite where an individual is can cause untold disruption to the working day.

Unfortunately and occasionally, I do forget to sign in or out of the signing in book.  The reason why I forget is almost certainly because I’m one of the first three individuals to get to the office in the morning, and often the first to consider bringing in the newspapers and milk left on the doorstep.  So somewhere between unlocking the door, deactivating the alarm, putting the milk away, reading the front page of the newspaper, grabbing my Ka Klub mug and going upstairs to my own little corner of the office, I forget to sign in.  How remiss of me!

Office policy originally dictated that we must sign in and out of the office each and every time we leave.  When I queried when, exactly, we should sign in or out, this was hastily changed to be office premises including the car park.  So if you popped outside for a fag, you didn’t have to sign out.

Presumably this being because none of the smokers have signed out... including the individual responsible for ensuring the book is kept up to date...  Except this individual used a scapegoat to pass the message on...

Or am I just being both cynical and unreasonable?

 

12/03/2004: Victory

Those of you who have been reading my blogging page will have realised what an effort achieving a decent workable parking facility has been at my office.  Management originally refused install some sort of guideline, after all we’re all sensible people and sensible people can park, right?  All we needed was a bit of common sense, no need for markers.  Never mind that most roads out there have white lines for guidance...

However, this morning I arrived at work - the first person to get to the office yet again - and I find that we now have guidelines for parking...  They’re very subtle, of course – a few wee dods of wood on the wall – but it doesn’t matter.  They’re there.

Is this a minor victory?  Can I now walk around with a smug look on my face?

No, probably not.  Somebody else will claim to have had this great idea...  But it doesn’t matter to me.  I’m happy.

09/03/2004: House Buying

It is perhaps my worst kept secret that Charlie and I wish to buy a house to use as a means of emigration.  It is through a house that we will be able to save the necessary capital such that we will be able to move from the United Kingdom, to the United States of America, and to California.

But house prices in York are bordering on the “unrealistic.”  Yes that’s right, they’re either “unrealistic” or “dramatically overpriced,” depending on your opinion.  Or I suppose one could put “loopy.”  One major financial lender publicly said that “first time buyers are priced out of the market, but it’s okay, two or more couples can club together to buy that first house.”

Right.  Find a friend and combine your money.  Doesn’t that say something when two full time workers cannot afford to buy their own home.

The statement is actually quite insulting, although this is of course a very emotional topic of discussion, so perhaps I’m being a little bit too sensitive?

So we’re been looking outside of the city, and contacting various estate agents, with a view to finding somewhere to live.

Daft prices in York?  It is all relative of course.  Daft for us means over triple joint earnings.  We’re not especially well paid, but by the same token, we seem to be bringing in a lot of cash on a month-by-month basis.

Some people might think that £185,000 for a three bedroom end town house, with a drive, double glazing and gas central heating, isn’t too bad.  Perhaps these individuals earn enough to make a mortgage on this value a realistic goal, or perhaps they already have a house with some equity to use as a deposit?  For first time buyers, without a deposit, this value of property is essentially in our dreams.  Oh and it doesn’t even have a garage.  Some are also “in need of some internal modernisation.”

Our budget varies according to how far we have to commute to get to work, but a broad figure of £70,000 is what we’re comfortable with borrowing (owing to a measure of Dervy-caution with regard to the future of interest rates).  We could stretch a little bit more in York and a little bit less if we’re living some distance from the city.

One can buy a “compact studio flat” for £70,000 inside York’s city walls.  Now a compact studio flat is just a posh way of saying “little bed-sit.”  So lets get this right; you want seventy grand for a pokey bed-sit, which doesn’t have any parking (and there’s nowhere close by) and storage heaters.  No, correct that, one storage heater.

I think not.

Colleagues can be an especially useless source of information.  “You don’t want to live there, it’s too rough” or “why not live in York, there’s a nice two bedroom terrace up my street, a bargain at just one hundred and twenty.”  Hello; we cannot afford this.  Their advice is useless unless they’re prepared to give us £60,000.  Funny that after mentioning this, the flow of advice usually stops.

The above written, some colleagues have been very supportive and helpful.

The Council were a little bit helpful, “if you cannot afford a mortgage, you shouldn’t be thinking about it” one employee said, then told me that the above comment was off the record.  Presumably he was a landlord, but I’ll discuss this in a little bit.  “You could try the Rowntree Housing Trust.”

The Housing Trust were helpful.  But even with a 25% cash advance (they have a share of the house) it was still too expensive.  Only a few thousand over our agreed limit, admittedly, but there has to be a point whereby you have to stop looking because they’re too expensive.

Estate agents.  Some estate agents are good because they don’t upset me with bad news.  This is because they ignore my requests for information, nor do they return telephone calls or emails.

Some estate agents have wonderful search facilities on their websites, can update you via email, and even by the telephone, however by the time they have updated you, the property has been sold and there are no more available.  It seems one has to do some serious bottom-kissing to make any progress.

Estate agents are also guilty of not telling you quite what they mean.  “Requires some attention” usually means, “it needs gutting and redecorating from scratch.”  “Close to a busy town centre” meant, in one example, “abandoned car in front of the house, used needles in the yard, and a really bad smell throughout the entire property.”  Yours for a mere £39,995, presumably including a contract with the local crime lord.

I could mention the “we’ve not tested anything in this house” disclaimer.  It usually means the central heating and plumbing.  It’s occasionally obvious that the central heating doesn’t work because the chuffing boiler is missing, or that the plumbing is requiring work because the pipe work is clearly split.

If the above sounds cynical, you’re right, it is.  So we’re buying somewhere privately, and cutting the estate agent out of the loop.  And Kermit is getting his own bedroom.  Yes, it is forty miles out of York, and yes we’ll have some not inconsiderable travel expenses, but travel expenses are discretionary.  You have to pay the mortgage.  You don’t always have to drive to work.  There are ways and means around the problem.

Does this mean that we’ll get fed up of the commute?  Possibly.  There will be opportunities closer to home, this is for sure.

But it will all become academic just as soon as the house value increases enough for us to be able to sell up and emigrate to California.  The clock is ticking.

I do love the United Kingdom, but when two full time employees have to struggle to afford to live close to where they work, this tells me that there is something wrong with the system.

America is calling.

Now if only we can introduce the Ka over there...

 

Footnote

 

So why are house prices so expensive in York?  Demand is the reason.  It’s demand caused by it being a “happening” city and by improving employment.  People need housing.

However, the “buy to let” brigade have really got their claws in the market.  Some landlords have amassed large numbers of properties, which they rent out at inflated prices.  Unfortunately, there’s nothing illegal with this activity.  A rise in interest rates isn’t going to make all that much difference to some of these landlords because the properties have relatively small mortgages.

24/02/2004: City Driving Numpties

Why do many people behave so stupidly in our cities, in stop / go traffic, hold ups, and jams?

On the one hand, you’ve the individual who was taught that when they move off, they are accelerating.  Some people are incapable of using just enough power to move off.  So they accelerate quite smartly, and then immediately have to brake quite firmly.  This is repeated until they either break their neck, their clutch, or their bumper on the car immediately in front.

Then we have those people who are incapable of ascertaining what is happening beyond the car immediately in front or behind their own vehicle.  These are the individuals who clog up junctions, roundabouts, or who stop dead in the road because the car they’ve been following is turning right.

Oh and we must not forget those people who are turning right, across the stream of traffic, but who don’t bother to position themselves thus blocking the road.

And those drivers for whom a traffic light immediately converts them into a racing driver.

Or those people who believe if their vehicle is stationary, something awful will happen to it and so when waiting for every traffic light, or at a junction, continuously inch their vehicle forwards.

Finally, although most bus drivers in and around York are careful, considerate drivers, there is a hard code cache of individuals to whom the bus represents a means of getting their own back on all of the other car drivers who may have upset them in the past.

Some smokers manage to almost completely fill their car with smoke, and although I’ve never seen anybody using their wipers in this situation, it must only be a matter of time.

 

11/02/2004: First Time Buyers

Charlie and I want to buy a house.  Now we’ve a few reasons for this, but the main one is that we’ve been renting property since we’ve been married and we’ve recently counted on how much money we’ve spent on this.  It’s a scary figure.  It’s buy-yourself-a-Streetka-with-change-for-a-heck-of-a-holiday money.  And this is only from four years.

Well, here’s the first snag.  We went along to see The Bank, understanding that whilst they wouldn’t be the cheapest, they are the most likely to be able to lend us the money.  After some discussion about salary multiples, interest rates, and all sorts of technical jargon, The Bank came up with The Figure.  The most that they would be prepared to lend us.  Actually, The Figure can only be up to 95% of the value of the property because we need to find the 5% deposit from somewhere.  I’ll deal with the deposit situation elsewhere.

Unfortunately, The Figure is significantly less than the value of the house that we live in.  Now we don’t live in a palace by any means - it’s a two bedroom, mid terrace house - quite small, but in a quiet enough area.  On street parking, some double glazing.  And typically sell for 125% of The Figure.

Okay, so perhaps we can move out of the centre of York and buy a brand new property?  If we’re buying a new place, the builders will sometimes fund the 5% deposit for us, and we also have the benefit of a fully fitted kitchen.

But here’s the snag.  The monthly interest-only payment is almost as much as our rent (which, by the way, we consider to be extortionate for what we have).  It’s within forty notes a month.  Then we take off the life assurance that we need, oh and whilst we’re at it we should also fund a savings vehicle too.  Oh, hang on, so we can’t afford to move out of the city and buy somewhere given the mortgage that The Bank have given us.

So what do we do?  Well we need to be spending less on a house, then, or we need to make more money.

I work for The Company.  I’m led to believe that I’m paid well for what I do.  But of far more importance, I love working at The Company and I have some good friends there.  Money by itself is not sufficient motivation for me to want to move somewhere else.

Buying a cheaper house is another idea, but begs the question of “where?”

 

05/02/2004 – Bad Parking Revisited

I’m sure it’s happened to most drivers.  You return to your vehicle and some inconsiderate tosser has boxed you in, or (arguably worse) has nearly boxed you in.  So you have to shunt backwards and forwards, backwards and forwards, and you know that the other driver is probably watching you from afar, having a chuckle at your misfortune.  I’ll wager that it won’t happen to somebody with lots of parking scrapes on their bumpers (hmmm, thinks, I wonder if you can get “battle damage transfer kits” for the Ka?).

What do you do when it’s a colleague at your workplace, in your office car park?  Well, you could start shouting blue murder from the car park knowing that somebody will hear you.  Of course, more likely than not, it’ll be your boss who hears you, and before you know it you’ll be standing in front of his desk whilst he chews a cigar (extrapolate this to suit your boss).

If you have fully comprehensive insurance you could “accidentally” drive into the offending vehicle(s), reverse, then make sure, knowing that all vehicles involved will be covered.  Or if you have just third party cover, you could do this anyway, since it is likely that you’ll do far more damage to their car than to your own.  You could write a snotty email message for all staff, naming and shaming the bad parkers, enclosing photographic evidence, or perhaps put up a website (www.badparking.com perhaps?) to tell the whole world about your problem.

Or you could just call NASA, after all, parking isn’t rocket science...

 

31/01/2004 – Numpty Snow Driving

I’m amazed at how many people’s intelligence drops with the temperature.  In late January, we had some snow in York.  Just a couple of inches of snow, although under the snow was a very slippery layer of ice.  It’s slippery enough to fall over when you walk across to the car... so why do people skid off the road and then somehow not believe it could be that slippery?

Or the chap who said to me, “hey my car’s great in the snow, the ABS’s really cool, but why does it take so long to stop?”  Kermit has ABS but you know, I’ve only triggered it intentionally...  and this is with his “nervous” tyre behaviour in low temperatures.

The news doesn’t help matters - headline stories of accidents then footage of numpties attempting to drive off in slippery conditions by simply depressing the accelerator harder doesn’t inspire confidence.

So, if you’re out in the snow, do bear the following:

·         If you fall over whilst walking to your car, it’s icy out there.

·         If you have to thaw the door locks, the windscreen and all of the windows, it’s probably icy out there.

·         If, when trying to drive off rather smartly, there’s a swishing noise and the engine revs are rising (you may even see some activity from the dashboard), you are wheelspinning.  Lift off the power and let the driven wheels decelerate before trying to move off again.

·         If you find that your brake pedal is jumping about under your feet and your stopping distance is measured in miles, you’re driving too fast in slippery conditions.

·         Use of the handbrake mid-way around a busy roundabout is not advisable.

·         It doesn’t matter if your BMW has electronic stability protection, it’s designed to allow some rear end oversteer, but it doesn’t understand that it’s slippery down there so you can still crash it.

·         I don’t care if you have four wheel drive, without proper tyres, you’re no safer than my little front wheel drive hatchback, except you’re carrying a lot more weight.

 

16/01/2004 – Parking!

When parking your vehicle, could all drivers please note that:

 

·         Those white lines are not advisory, you are required to park inside them.  It is also advisable that you park in the centre of the bay, such that the person next to you can actually get into or out of their vehicle.

·         Try to imagine those lines forming a box, and then get the nose inside the front and the stern inside the back.  If your car is too long to use the spot, compromise and be sensible.  Don’t let the car’s nose or rump overhang by eight feet.

·         “Touch parking” is a sign of excessive stupidity.  Learn the size of your car using a wall, not other peoples car.

·         If you do drive into somebody, owning up and admitting you did it won’t get your lights punched out.  Not admitting you did it and being seen committing the act may well do so.

·         Car parks contain parked and moving vehicles, narrow spaces, pedestrians and maybe even loose trolleys.  First gear is suitable.  Third gear combined with hard acceleration is not.

·         Kindly note that the vehicle next to you is not designed to prevent your door from opening too far.  Don’t let your door bang against it.

·         Wear your seatbelt.  You’d feel especially stupid if you managed to crash into something and woke up buried in a pile of shopping trolleys because you didn’t put your seatbelt on.

·         When you’re in a supermarket, take your shopping trolley back to the depot!  Not only are you being lazy, but you confuse Fiat Siecento owners, who when they see a whole bunch of trolleys in a car park, immediately think that it’s an owners club meet.

·         Do try to plan entry and egress into the parking bay.  It’s often easier to reverse in, but if you’re buying a load of shopping, consider putting the car nose in.  Of course, reverse in if you’re lucky enough to be driving something with a boot in the nose of the vehicle.

Note the positioning and function of the little button on the handbrake (or parking brake).  Use it.

 

10/01/2004 – Mercedes Drivers

After reading this, which made me chuckle, I think a similar document needs to be written for Mercedes Benz drivers – especially those company car drivers who have finally been able to afford to lease “their first Merc,” either a C180 or an A140:

·         That badge may have been bought to impress the neighbours, but it doesn’t impress me.  So back off, I’m not going to go any quicker, actually if you continue to drive eighteen inches of Kermit’s exhaust, I’ll slow down to bring you in even closer.  Eventually we’ll stop.  Just you wait.

·         Indicators do contain bulbs or LEDs, and are a useful clue for the other motorist as to what you’re doing.  And the stalk’s there too – so use it.

·         I appreciate that the accelerator pedal is especially heavy to as to save fuel, but occasionally one does have to depress it rather more than normal to ascend the hill.

·         When you are stationary in your automatic Mercedes Benz, it probably puts itself into neutral, so you can use the parking brake and get off the foot brake.  Those eighteen watt brake light bulbs are burning the image of your lamps into the back of my head!

·         Just because you have fancy headlights, doesn’t mean you have to use them all of the time.  And your standard halogen fog lamps look awful compared to the Xenons so switch them off!

·         The three pointed star is not a lead-in target for other motorists in supermarket car parks.  You can keep coming towards me, I’m not moving out of your way just because you keep on creeping forward.

·         If you continue to look down upon me from your “executive saloon,” I’ll continue to point and leer at your cloth trim, whilst I’m sat on leather.

·         I don’t care if it has a Merc badge on it, it’s cousin is the Dodge Neon, deal with it.

·         Is that an Elk?  <mwahahahahahah!>

 

17/11/2003 – Sidelights

I don’t get the point of allowing people to drive with either sidelights or “dimmed dip.”  Why do manufacturers allow this?  Why do people drive around with what appear to be deceased glow worms masquerading as light bulbs?  Do the manufacturers not realise that stupid people believe that because the dashboard is illuminated, their lights are effective?  Do drivers see other cars with sidelights aglow, maybe even the same make, model and age as their own vehicle, see how useless the illumination, and do something about it?  The answer to all of these questions is clearly a resounding “no!”

And what’s worse than a driver in misty or foggy conditions with sidelights on?  A driver in perfect conditions (day or night) with sidelights and fog lamps lit (usually front, sometimes rear and sometimes both).

So what’s the point of a sidelight setting?  Running lights?  Errr, no.  Parking?  Yes, I suppose.

06/11/2003 – Traffic Lights

Do people not realise that traffic lights issue instructions?  Some drivers seem to think that the signals they provide are merely recommendations!  Just this morning whilst walking to work, a dark silvery grey BMW 530d (yes it may be sad that I noted the model) drove up to a light that turned to amber, and then, without any change of speed, went right through the red lamp.  And for what?  To save a few seconds?

Drivers also have a dangerous habit of moving off when the light flicks to amber rather than waiting until it hits green.  I’ve already witnessed one accident in York because of this.

So am I missing something?  Are you a wimp if you don’t consider traffic lights to be advisory?  Are such lamps only there for the timid drivers?

04/11/2003 – Headlights

Tonight I was following a Citroën Xsara down a moderately twisty main road in the dark, nobody in front, reasonably late on, and the other driver seemed unwilling to drive beyond 45 mph.  Unfortunately, he or she also did not appear to understand the concept of “main beam” (or “brights” for any American readers out there).  So we’re dawdling along at the heady speed of 45 mph, and I’m unable to safely overtake since I cannot see much beyond the car in front, since he or she is doing very little to illuminate the road!  As we go through a few villages with 40 mph speed limits, I slow down to stick inside the Law, but the Xsara driver doesn’t.  Thus, a couple of minutes after leaving the village, I catch up with it again.

At the exit of one village, it leads to approximately a mile and a half of dual carriageway, so as we leave the 40 limit, we’re down into third gear, and extending the engine.  Unfortunately, Xsara guy sees this Ka bearing down on him, and I guess he or she likes looking at the front of it, because he accelerates hard too.  He accelerates to a speed that it significantly above 70 mph too, and leaves me pretty much standing.

That’s okay, I can cope with this, perhaps he’s decided to get a move on.

But, no, two miles after the dual carriageway switches back into single carriageway, I catch up with him again!