Petrol ‘v’ Diesel
|
I |
’m often asked what the difference, in
performance, is between two cars with an engine with a given power output, but
one engine is a petrol and the other diesel.
In short, the performance difference between
cars of a given equal power and weight will be little, subject to aerodynamic
efficiency and gearing. Generally
speaking, the higher the power output, the more compromised the turbodiesel
will feel when driven at one hundred percent.
There are several examples of cars with very
similar power outputs but few with similar weights. An easy example to make is the mark one
Mondeo. The 1·6 petrol produces 90 PS and
the 1·8 TD produces 88 PS. However, the
TD is around 100 kg heavier, so the diesel has a materially lower power to
weight ratio. The diesel also has taller
gearing, too, which reduces the effective output at the road.
Statistics
In terms of numbers, the 1·6 has a power to
weight ratio of 71 PS per tonne and the 1·8 TD, just 65.
Looking at the manufacturers quoted figures,
the 1·6 is quicker.
It reaches 62 miles per hour around a second and a half quicker than the
TD, and despatches the important 30 to 70 dash a full three seconds quicker
than the TD. We’d expect there to be
this difference, especially in the in-gear acceleration, given the greater
power to weight and shorter gearing of the 1·6.
Power Delivery
On the road the two are different to
drive. The engines have different power characteristics.
The 1·6i-16 performs at its best from 4,000 to 6,000 rpm whereas the 1·8
TD performs at its best from 2,300 rpm to 4,000 rpm. At a cruise of 60 Indicated the 1·6 is
turning over at around 2,800 rpm compared with just 2,300 rpm for the TD.
Very Low Speed
By Very Low Speed, I also mean moving off.
Neither car has brilliant acceleration but the
1·6 is certainly an easier machine. It’s
easy to move off smartly but without wheelspinning. This is much harder in the TD: too many revs
and you get too much turbo boost, which is wheelspun
away. Too few revs and you get no boost
pressure, so the car bogs down. This
makes the TD relatively difficult under certain circumstances, such as over a busy roundabout.
Advantage to the 1·6 petrol here.
Single Gear Acceleration
The TD has an immediate disadvantage here
since there’s turbocharger lag to contend with.
You need to keep the engine operating between 2,000 and 4,000 rpm for
meaningful acceleration. The 1·6 by
comparison, yes it doesn’t really get going until you have 4,000 rpm on the
tachometer but this isn’t to say it cannot accelerate from lower engine
speeds. Gear selection is less critical.
Boot the accelerator from 60 in top gear and
neither car exactly catapults forwards.
The 1·6 really wants a gear down and the TD has to get over the
turbocharger lag. Once the turbocharger
is turbocharging, the TD has greater acceleration.
Try the same test from 40 in fourth, and the
TD pulls very well (again, once the
turbocharger is blowing) whereas the 1·6 feels sluggish in comparison. On both cases, the 1·6 would prefer a lower
gear or two but the TD doesn’t feel disadvantage. The difference is most obvious the faster you
are driving; comparing the two on the motorway, you’d take the TD.
Through The Gears
We need to consider through the gear
acceleration, such as when overtaking.
As an example is when we are joining a dual carriageway from a slip road
with a relatively tight curve, something I do most days now. There’s a tight left hander, taken about
thirty, which then flattens into a gentler right hander, forming the
acceleration lane, then dumping you on to the dual carriageway after around 150
yards. In both cars you’d use third,
unless you were feeling particularly gung-ho in the 1·6 and you’d use
second. Accelerating from 30 in third,
the TD has a small advantage until around 40 or so, when the 1·6 starts clawing
back the distance. Then you need to
change up in the TD, somewhere around the 50 point. Select fourth and wait for the lag. Meanwhile, you’re still accelerating In the
1·6 until you reach the speed limit, when you can select top.
It’s the change that hinders the TD: advantage
1·6 petrol.
Airport Run
You can fit all sorts of stuff in the back of
a Mondeo, from a fridge freezer to a stack of moving boxes, or luggage for
four. My final comparison is to compare
the cars when laden with “stuff” such as four people plus their luggage. Four people plus a suitcase each is reckoned
to add somewhere around 300 kg to the car, which as a percentage, makes a
greater impact on the 1·6 petrol.
Both cars are slower, that’s for sure, but you notice it less in the
TD. Whereas the 1·6 struggles up hills
without changing down one or two gears.
The extra weight robs it of flexibility.
By comparison, the TD is slower but just as flexible. Advantage, TD, especially
on those long motorway gradients where the TD just keeps going but the 1·6
needs fourth.
Fuel Economy
Most people buy a turbodiesel because you get
most of the performance of a mid-sized petrol engine combined with superior (lower) fuel consumption. The same is true of the Mondeo. Driven gently and with a good leaning towards
fuel consumption, the 1·6 can certain return very respectable figures. I have personally managed over forty to the
gallon from a mark one Mondeo 1·6 on a 400 mile, mostly motorway drive at HGV pace.
However, from similar drives in the mark one Mondeo 1·8 TD, I could
return upwards of fifty miles per gallon.
On average, the TD is some 25% more economical than the 1·6.
Summary
Driven hard through the gears or on the test
track, the 1·6 petrol is going to be quicker than the TD. With a greater rev range you often have a
wider choice of gears to use for any one speed.
However when driven in a more sedate pace, especially when laden, you
appreciate that the 1·6 needs that choice in ratio. The 1·6 would be a better choice for the
enthusiast, but really, enthusiasts wouldn’t be looking at the 1·6 or TD
Mondeo.
For the motorway, the TD is the superior
machine. If you live in a hilly area,
you face a difficult decision: the TD provides for a more relaxed hill climbing
ability but if you get stuck behind something on a steep gradient, you’ll find
the 1·6 better at overtaking!
|
|