The Fiat Punto
|
O |
ne
of the benefits of taking my Cinquecento back to the Fiat dealership was that I
was usually given a Punto as a courtesy car, and the earlier Puntos drove in a
similar way to the Cinquecento: in-your-face, have-at-you good natured fun. More or less!
The
first Punto I had was a 55 S, which uses Fiat’s 1·1 litre engine that also saw
service in the Cinquecento and Siecento. Compared with other 1·1s I’ve driven,
principally the PSA 1·1 donk, the Fiat unit is louder, less powerful, but has
lots more character. It was also
economical too (having a 70 mile round trip to and from the dealership, and
usually another 50 miles to and from work, meant that I preferred economical
courtesy cars).
Despite
the 1·1’s many merits, the later 60 engines - a 1·25 litre unit with 58 PS -
were a useful improvement. Whilst the
headline performance figures were similar, the 60 models have usefully more low
down and mid range thump, and feel significantly quicker in normal
driving. I had two of these as courtesy
cars, and both were surprisingly competent.
The
Fiat dealership also gave me a ride in the early Sporting model, powered by a
1·6 litre donk (with 88 PS and 129 Nm), which I found very tractable if
not especially quick, and one look at the fuel economy put me off (the
combined fuel consumption figure being a lowly 35·0 mpg). However, with the extra grunt and a stiffer
suspension set up, the Punto Sporting felt surprisingly able.
The
newer 1·25 16V Sporting, with 85 PS, was a different beast. I never had the opportunity to drive a Punto
85 but I’m informed that it’s a very spunky little engine. Although the 1·25 16V donk has lower headling
output figures, it makes up for this with a sweet, revvy nature and it also
weighs less, so outright performance was slightly better (and fuel
consumption was much better).
Finally,
saving the best to last and all that, the salesman at Lincoln Fiat enthused
over the Punto GT. These pocket rockets
come with a 1·4 litre, turbocharged engine 8v, which produces lots of power and
torque from 3,000 rpm, but suffers from turbocharger lag. This makes it fun for a test drive but, I
suspect, not so much fun when you are just wanting to drive “normally.” The GT also has quite a stiff suspension
setup, and looks mean wearing that Arbath kit.
Despite the faults, and the juicy fuel consumption, the GT Punto has
more character than most other hot hatches, and it’s one of the quicker in a
straight line. Furthermore, it has the
usual Punto interior space. I still
have an admiration for the car, and could see myself in one if money were no
object.
I
like the Punto’s Italian engines, the huge interior space, looks,
equipment and value for money. But the
Fiat dealership experience lets them down.